What Happened When We Set Up a Robotics Lab in a Mall

What Happened When We Set Up a Robotics Lab in a Mall

5 min read•Apr 14, 2026•
David Kim
David Kim

In the summer of 2025, the Robotics and AI Institute (RAI Institute) launched an innovative pop-up robotics lab inside the CambridgeSide mall. This unique initiative aimed to bridge the gap between the general public and advanced robotics technology by offering direct, hands-on experiences with state-of-the-art robots. The experiment not only showcased the technological capabilities of modern robots but also explored how people perceive and interact with them across different real-world scenarios.


Designing a Robot Experience for the General Public

The RAI Institute designed the mall pop-up lab to provide both educational and interactive experiences, making robotics accessible to a diverse audience. The space was divided into two main areas: a museum exhibit showcasing historical and modern robots, and an interactive driving arena called “Drive-a-Spot,” where visitors could control a Spot quadruped robot.

The museum area featured a range of robots, including earlier legged prototypes developed by RAI and commercially available models like ANYmal from ANYbotics. This helped visitors appreciate the evolution and diversity of robotic platforms. Meanwhile, the “Drive-a-Spot” arena allowed people of all ages—from toddlers to seniors—to remotely operate Spot using a custom adaptive video game controller designed with large, easy-to-press buttons. This inclusive design ensured that anyone could engage with the robot, regardless of physical ability or prior experience.

The driving arena was intentionally challenging, featuring tight spaces, low and tall obstacles, and barriers that required Spot to crouch or step over. Spot’s autonomous terrain adaptation was a highlight, as it could adjust its movements to navigate these obstacles while under joystick supervision. The arena’s scenario themes rotated among factory, home, hospital, and outdoor/disaster settings, reflecting environments where robots are at varying levels of acceptance and utility.


Impact of Direct Interaction on Public Perception

A key objective of the pop-up lab was to understand how firsthand interaction with robots influences public comfort and perceived suitability of robots in different settings. Visitors who drove Spot participated in surveys before and after their experience. They rated their comfort levels and opinions on how well Spot would function in factory, home, hospital, office, and outdoor/disaster environments.

Results showed that direct interaction generally increased comfort and positively influenced perceptions of robot suitability, especially in industrial and emergency response contexts. Interestingly, even in settings where people initially felt ambivalent or skeptical—like homes and hospitals—exposure to the robot’s capabilities helped reduce apprehension. Participants often expressed surprise at Spot’s agility and responsiveness, which contrasted with their prior assumptions shaped by sensationalized media.

These findings emphasize the importance of experiential learning in shaping realistic attitudes toward robots, highlighting how physical encounters can demystify technology and foster acceptance.


Challenges in Public Robotics Engagement

While the pop-up lab succeeded in engaging a broad audience, it also highlighted challenges in public robotics interaction. One is the balance between robot autonomy and user control; visitors needed to feel in command while appreciating the robot’s autonomous adjustments. Designing intuitive interfaces that accommodate all ages and abilities remains a key consideration.

Another challenge is managing expectations. Many visitors had preconceived notions fueled by media portrayals, leading to either unrealistic optimism or fear. The controlled environment of the lab helped set realistic expectations, but scaling such educational efforts to wider audiences poses logistical and cost challenges.

Finally, integrating robots into public spaces like malls requires careful attention to safety, accessibility, and social norms, ensuring that robots complement human activities without causing discomfort or disruption.


The Role of Context: Where Robots Fit Best

The rotating themes of the driving arena underscored how context shapes acceptance of robotic technology. Industrial and emergency response scenarios generally elicited higher comfort and perceived suitability ratings, reflecting existing familiarity with robots in these domains.

In contrast, domestic and healthcare settings remain more sensitive. People expressed concerns about privacy, reliability, and emotional connection when imagining robots in homes or hospitals. However, hands-on experience helped alleviate some of these concerns by showcasing robots’ practical benefits and user-friendly operation.

For buyers and developers, this underscores the importance of tailoring robot design and communication strategies to specific environments and user expectations. Understanding where robots naturally integrate and where additional trust-building is needed will be crucial for broader adoption.


What This Means for Buyers

For organizations and individuals considering robot adoption, the RAI Institute’s mall experiment offers several insights:

  • User Experience Matters: Intuitive, accessible control systems can significantly improve user acceptance and operational effectiveness. Consider investing in adaptive interfaces that cater to diverse users.
  • Context Is Key: Evaluate how the robot will fit into your specific environment—industrial, healthcare, home, or outdoor—and address the unique challenges and expectations of each.
  • Education Builds Trust: Providing hands-on demonstrations and experiences can help stakeholders and end-users develop realistic expectations and reduce apprehension.
  • Autonomy with Supervision: Balancing autonomous capabilities with user oversight enhances safety and confidence, especially in complex or dynamic environments.

For those interested in exploring robots similar to Spot or other interactive platforms, browse quadruped robots on Robot Overflow or explore industrial and service robots suited for various applications.


Conclusion

The pop-up robotics lab in a busy public mall demonstrated that direct experience with robots can meaningfully shift public perceptions and increase comfort with robotic technology. By combining education, interaction, and inclusive design, the RAI Institute provided valuable data on how people relate to robots in different settings. This approach offers a model for stakeholders aiming to integrate robots into everyday spaces, emphasizing that successful adoption depends not only on technology but also on thoughtful engagement with users.


Arizona appeals court vacates manslaughter sentence after AI video

An Arizona appeals court vacated the 10.5-year sentence of Gabriel Horcasitas while upholding his manslaughter conviction, first reported by Nytimes. The case returns to Maricopa County Superior Court for resentencing without the video, after judges found that it presented scripted statements as if the victim himself were speaking in court.

The three-judge panel said the video generated a likeness of Christopher Pelkey’s voice and appearance but did not reflect actual events. It found that allowing and relying on the video made the sentencing fundamentally unfair, and noted that no prior Arizona case had addressed the admissibility of such a depiction at sentencing.

The judges said a victim’s right to speak cannot override a defendant’s right to be sentenced on accurate, reliable information. They said the video collapsed the distinction between the family’s belief about what Pelkey would have said and Pelkey’s own voice and opinions.

The ruling distinguishes family members speaking about Pelkey from a generated likeness that appeared to speak for him.

Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales, presented the video during Horcasitas’s sentencing alongside victim-impact statements from family and friends. Wales wrote the script and said her husband and the couple’s longtime business partner helped create the video using Pelkey’s voice from a YouTube video and his face and torso from a funeral-service poster.

Judge Todd F. Lang praised the video as genuine, then imposed the maximum sentence of 10.5 years, more than the nine years prosecutors had sought.

Wales said nobody intended to make the court believe Pelkey was alive or that he had recorded the video before his death. She said she disagreed with the ruling and argued that families use slide shows, collages, hypothetical conversations and poetry to convey grief.

Wales compared the AI video with photography, saying it took 15 years of landmark cases around the 1860s before photography was widely accepted in courts.

The case returns to Maricopa County Superior Court for a new sentencing hearing without the AI-generated video.