Chery buys Nissan’s Rosslyn factory to make EVs

Chery buys Nissan’s Rosslyn factory to make EVs

2 min readAug 15, 2026
Ben Harris
Ben Harris

Chery bought Nissan’s Rosslyn factory near Pretoria, South Africa, to build EVs there, first reported by Cleantechnica. The factory will produce fully electric, plug-in hybrid and Jetour models as rising incomes and falling electric-vehicle costs, particularly for vehicles from Chinese companies, make Africa a promising new region for Chinese EV investment.

The purchase comes as 2026 is a down year for China’s EV market. Chinese EV companies have worked to get their cars into other Asian, European and South American markets, while some Chinese automakers have started building or buying factories outside China as well as in China.

In June, 685,000 pure-electric vehicles were sold in China, accounting for approximately 43% of the country’s auto market. The June sales figure sits alongside a 2026 down year for China’s EV market.

Africa’s EV investment prospects

Analysts say South Africa, Morocco, Kenya, Ethiopia and Ghana are among the countries best positioned to attract Chinese EV investment because of industrial capacity, supportive policies or growing electricity infrastructure. Morocco also benefits from proximity to European export markets, while Zimbabwe’s large lithium reserves could support battery supply chains.

Hiten Parmar, executive director of South African nonprofit The Electric Mission, said Africa has become known as the next frontier for the automotive market.

Africa’s fuel-import position

Most African countries import all or most of their oil and gas. Africa is also a net importer of refined fuels, which drains foreign reserves and weighs on local currencies and budgets.

Switching to locally produced electricity could make a huge difference in their economies. Nick Hedley, an energy transition research analyst at Zero Carbon Analytics, said: “Switching to local electric cars for transportation is in African countries’ national interest.”

Meta agrees to teen limits in settlement costing up to $17B

Meta has reached a settlement with attorneys general from 47 states over allegations that it illegally manipulated children’s attention, first reported by Newyorker. The agreement could cost the company up to $17 billion and would change how Facebook and Instagram handle teen access through age verification, daily limits and nighttime restrictions.

Meta did not acknowledge wrongdoing. The Oakland trial turned on whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects providers from liability for user-posted content, should also shield the algorithms that shape what users see; the plaintiffs argued that it should not.

The states presented evidence that senior executives, intent on maximizing the company’s growth, repeatedly set aside concerns about what Meta’s products were doing to its youngest users. A former Meta engineer testified that the chance of a teen encountering violent or graphic content was between a hundred and four hundred times higher than what the company acknowledged publicly.

Meta also spent more than two billion dollars on legal defense in the second quarter of 2026 alone.

Under the agreement, Facebook and Instagram will remove the like count on posts, do more to verify that users are at least thirteen years old, limit service to two hours a day for teenagers and restrict service entirely for those users during nighttime hours.

The settlement was quickly compared with the tobacco lawsuits of the nineties. But Meta is a trillion-dollar company increasingly invested in artificial intelligence, and the agreement applies to only a single facet of its sprawling operations. The deal places a striking financial cost alongside product changes focused on teen users.

New technologies are being disseminated ever more quickly, while the machinery of politics and law delivers accountability intermittently and at a painstaking crawl. It took more than a decade of worrying about how teenagers used Facebook and Instagram for a legal settlement to enforce a change in Meta’s behavior.

Florida’s attorney general, James Uthmeier, stayed away from the lawsuit, arguing that it did not go far enough. After the settlement was announced, he said, “We’ll see them at trial.”

🍪 Cookie preferences

We use cookies to measure performance. Privacy Policy